• Arrogant personality, and an extremely unreliable InDrive Driver: “never went for pre-arranged vehicle servicing in a timely manner”
• Weekly payment made on-time to vehicle owner was only approximately 45%
• Ngonidzaishe Mandengu Crashed the Nissan vehicle given to him and did not pay a cent towards the $440+ repair cost.
• In a nutshell, there are thousands of credible drivers in Harare, but Ngonidzaishe is not one of them. if considering to contract him as a driver of your vehicle for opreation on InDrive, Bolt or any other such platform, be sure to obtain a substantial deposit from him.

“Ngonidzaishe Mandengu (Ngoni) Crashed My Vehicle Whilst Driving on InDrive in Harare”

Ngonidzaishe Mandengu (refers to himself as Ngoni), is a 39-year-old man currently residing in the Charlotte Brooke area of Harare (originally from Bindura), Zimbabwe. He is a part-time unorthodox pastor (self-proclaimed evangelist), digital marketer, and a driver who is active on both InDrive and Bolt, within Harare, Zimbabwe. Over the last few months, we have received two separate open declarations about Ngoni, as an InDrive driver within Harare: one of which is explored herein.

In September of 2025, Ngoni was taken up as a driver, and subsequently provided with a Nissan vehicle to that effect. Within two weeks of operating as a driving, he began missing his weekly pay-in target amounts and dates, missing appointments to the mechanic for routine maintenance, and concurrently attempting to pursue other business activities (such as telemarketing, supply of dogs as security articles, and conducting church-related errands: all whilst within his hours of being active on InDrive.

In the middle of December 2025, after many weeks of displaying baseless cockiness outright unreliability, and untrustworthiness as an InDrive driver, Ngoni crashed the Nissan vehicle he was given, whilst driving on Seke road in Harare, during the early hours of one morning. He blamed a Kombi for cutting into his lane, yet that claim was never substantiated. Despite being asked to do so by the vehicle’s owner, Ngoni never reported the accident to the police, and as such never received and or provided a police report to the owner of the Nissan vehicle. Furthermore, there was not even a single witness to substantial his claim of events.

As evident from the photos of the Nissan vehicle above, Ngonidzaishe had caused some very notable damage to the vehicle he was contracted to use on InDrive. The vehicle had to be towed from the scene of the crash on Seke road in Harare and on to a nearby mechanic, on the 17th of December 2025. The plethora of repair requirements for the vehicle included: repair to both front wheels, repair to shock absorbers, replacement of several broken parts near the front wheels, and considerable panel-beating work to the front of the vehicle.

After several back-and-forth discussions between Ngonidzaishe and the vehicle owner, Ngoni, claimed that he could not afford the repair bill at once, all whilst insisting that the accident was not his fault.

The vehicle was subsequently repaired by its owner, with a total repair bill going beyond $440. Ngonidzaishe Mandengu was promptly dismissed as the vehicle’s driver. The vehicle’s owner concludes that Ngoni is extremely unprofessional as a driver: and more so as an InDrive driver. If any vehicle owner out there comes across him or his request to use anyone’s vehicle for InDrive or any other related purpose, it would be extremely foolish to assign any vehicle to him without collection of an initial payment deposit: to cover a minimum of two weeks of weekly payments. Better still, a more credible and suitable driver should be sought.

THE FUTURE OF WORKERS

In an era marked by unprecedented technological advancements, the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and automation has become the epicentre of profound changes in the socioeconomic landscape. As we stand at the precipice of a transformative era, the traditional paradigms of employment are undergoing seismic shifts. From the swift integration of AI and automation in various industries to the looming question of employability in an increasingly digital world, the future of workers is a big dilemma.

This article delves into the rapid adoption of AI and automation, the evolving nature of employment, and the divisive discourse surrounding Universal Basic Income (UBI) – a potential panacea or a fiscal trap?

The Rapid Adoption of AI and Automation

In the contemporary industrial landscape, the rapid assimilation of artificial intelligence (AI) and automation technologies stands as a defining hallmark of our era. The relentless pursuit of operational efficiency and precision has spurred an integration of these technologies across various sectors. This paradigm shift has profound implications for the workforce, with tasks traditionally executed by human employees now seamlessly delegated to machines.
Industries, ranging from manufacturing to service-oriented sectors, are recalibrating their operational frameworks, marking the beginning of a time when it’s becoming harder to distinguish between what humans and machines can do.

The repercussions of this accelerated adoption of AI and automation are multifaceted. Notably, occupations characterised by routine and repetitive tasks find themselves at the forefront of automation, resulting in a tangible displacement of human workers. This shift necessitates a fundamental reassessment of the skill sets demanded by the job market, prompting a collective urgency for workforce upskilling and reskilling initiatives. As algorithms and machine learning algorithms continue to evolve, the dichotomy between human ingenuity and technological efficacy becomes more pronounced, raising critical questions about the ability of the workforce to remain relevant and competitive in an environment increasingly shaped by intelligent automation.

Moreover, the transformative impact extends beyond mere job displacement. Companies, driven by imperatives of cost-effectiveness and operational efficiency, are compelled to recalibrate their organisational structures. The symbiotic relationship between technology and human labour necessitates a delicate equilibrium, where the advantages of technological precision are harnessed without compromising the qualities of human intuition, creativity, and adaptability. As industries navigate this intricate balance, the broader implications for employment dynamics become increasingly salient, requiring an understanding of the evolving relationship between human employees and their automated counterparts.

The ability to navigate a terrain where the lines between traditional employment roles and automated functionalities are redrawn demands a proactive approach to skill acquisition and continuous learning. Consequently, the rapid adoption of AI and automation serves not only as a catalyst for technological progress but also as a compelling call to action for individuals, industries, and policymakers alike to collaboratively sculpt a future where the convergence of human intellect and artificial intelligence leads to a synergistic advancement rather than a displacement of the workforce.

From Human Employees to Machine Workers

The metamorphosis from reliance on human employees to the integration of machine workers signifies a profound shift in the dynamics of contemporary employment. This transition is not merely a conceptual evolution but a tangible restructuring of the workforce, propelled by the inexorable advance of automation technologies. Tasks once entrusted to human hands, particularly those characterised by repetitiveness and predictability, now find their execution efficiently delegated to machines.

Historically, manual and routine tasks have borne the brunt of this transformation. Factories that were once bustling with human workers operating machinery are now often populated by automated systems, conducting operations with precision and efficiency that surpass human capacity. The assembly line has undergone a transformation where the rhythmic clatter of human labour has been replaced by the hum of machines executing tasks with unwavering accuracy.

This trend, however, is not confined to the manufacturing sector alone. Service-oriented industries, too, have experienced a paradigm shift. Automated customer service representatives, chatbots, and virtual assistants have become commonplace, supplanting roles that were traditionally fulfilled by human employees. As technology continues to advance, the scope of jobs susceptible to automation expands, encroaching upon sectors that were once deemed impervious to mechanisation.

Looking ahead, the trajectory indicates that this shift is poised to intensify. According to PwC’s Global Artificial Intelligence Study, projections indicate substantial economic gains attributable to AI, in particular China, where a remarkable 26% boost to GDP is anticipated by 2030. Notably, North America is poised to experience a significant 14.5% increase, contributing to a staggering total of $10.7 trillion. This figure, accounting for nearly 70% of the projected global economic impact, underscores the pivotal role that AI is set to play in shaping the future of economies worldwide.

The Future of Employment

As the march of technology continues unabated, the future of employment stands at the intersection of promise and peril. The widespread adoption of AI and automation raises fundamental questions about the nature of work and the adaptability of the current workforce. While these technologies offer unparalleled efficiency and innovation, they simultaneously cast a shadow over traditional job roles, prompting a reevaluation of the skills and qualifications that will be in demand.

One of the primary concerns is the potential displacement of jobs due to the automation of routine tasks. Industries that have traditionally been labour-intensive, such as manufacturing and customer service, are witnessing a transformation where machines can perform tasks faster and more accurately than their human counterparts. This has led to a growing anxiety about job security and has sparked a global conversation about the reskilling and upskilling needed to keep the workforce relevant in an age of automation.

According to papers published by the UK government, clerical and routine manual roles may see negative net employment in the following 5-10 years, and other categories, such as taxi or truck drivers may see negative net employment in the following 20 years due to vehicle automation.

Simultaneously, the rise of AI is giving birth to entirely new industries and job categories. Roles centred around the development, maintenance, and oversight of AI systems are becoming increasingly critical. Data scientists, machine learning engineers, and AI ethicists are just a few examples of professions that are gaining prominence. The challenge lies in ensuring that the current workforce can seamlessly transition into these emerging roles, but the UK government already announced a £118 million boost to skills funding to bridge the gap.

It’s clear that policymakers find themselves at a crossroads, tasked with creating frameworks that encourage innovation while safeguarding the welfare of workers. Striking the right balance involves investments in education and training programs that equip individuals with the skills demanded by the job market of the future. Initiatives promoting lifelong learning and fostering a culture of adaptability are crucial components of a strategy aimed at preparing the workforce for the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead.

Universal Basic Income: A New Requirement or Fiscal Trap

The concept of Universal Basic Income (UBI) has gained prominence as a proposed solution to address the economic disruptions caused by the rapid adoption of AI and automation. Proponents argue that providing a guaranteed income to all citizens, irrespective of their employment status, could act as a social safety net, mitigating the potential fallout from widespread unemployment. However, the debate surrounding UBI is far from settled, with critics expressing concerns about its feasibility, sustainability, and long-term consequences.

Advocates of UBI contend that it could provide financial stability to individuals in a future where traditional jobs may be scarce. By offering a basic income that covers essential living expenses, UBI aims to empower individuals to pursue education, entrepreneurship, or activities that contribute to their well-being and the community at large. Moreover, proponents argue that UBI could serve as a means to address income inequality, providing a more equitable distribution of resources in a society increasingly characterised by economic disparities.

On the other side of the spectrum, sceptics caution that implementing UBI on a large scale could lead to a fiscal trap. The primary concern revolves around the financial burden placed on governments to sustain such a system. Funding a universal basic income for an entire population requires substantial financial resources, leading to questions about taxation, budget allocations, and the potential impact on overall economic stability. Detractors argue that the costs associated with UBI could result in increased taxes, inflation, or cuts to essential public services, potentially exacerbating the very issues it seeks to address.

Additionally, critics raise concerns about the potential disincentive for individuals to actively participate in the workforce. If a basic income is guaranteed regardless of employment, some argue that it might reduce the motivation for individuals to seek employment or pursue career advancements. This perceived reduction in workforce participation could have broader implications for economic productivity and innovation.

As debates over UBI continue, pilot programs and experiments in various parts of the world, including in England, with two micro pilot schemes in central Jarrow and East Finchley, in north London. The aim is to provide real world data on its feasibility and impact and to answer critical questions about the effectiveness of UBI in supporting individuals, stimulating economic activity, and fostering societal well-being.

In Conclusion

In conclusion, the future of workers is at a crossroads, marked by the rapid integration of AI and automation. As we navigate this transformative period, careful consideration must be given to the evolving nature of employment and the potential consequences for the workforce. Whether we are headed towards a future where human workers are rendered unemployable by machines or one where new opportunities emerge, the decisions we make today will shape the socioeconomic landscape for generations to come.